Jones's Bad Blood (Free Press, 1981), but its more inviting format and directness in addressing hard issues provide an accessibility that is vital to understanding the lessons to be learned from this era in American social history. Overall, the scope of Uschan's work closely resembles that of James H. Annotated listings of further reading include three of the best books available on this study. Extensive notes and works consulted sections offer numerous books, periodical articles, and more than a dozen Web sites. Informational sidebars provide additional descriptions and photographs of some of the damage done by untreated syphilis. Halftone photographs of participants and of the persons who designed, conducted, or criticized the project supplement the text. The last two chapters deal with how it was revealed to the public and what the United States government did for the surviving participants and their families. How it changed and when it became truly unethical are explained just as clearly. A description of who devised the study and its original purposes reveals the benign nature of this undertaking at its start. Its full title, used throughout this work, is the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. The introduction relates the shock and outrage engendered by the study when its existence became known publicly in 1972. Grade 8 Up-What is usually only a footnote in works describing the history of race relations in America is here recounted in full detail.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |